One of the most common questions asked by patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease is: "Should I have bypass surgery, or is there a non-surgical treatment option?" This article compares EECP, bypass surgery, and angioplasty/stenting to see which option comes into play in which situation.
One of the questions most often asked by patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease is this: "Should I have bypass surgery, or is there a non-surgical treatment option?" In this article we compare EECP, bypass surgery, and angioplasty/stent procedures to look at which option comes into play in which situation.
Coronary bypass (CABG) is open-heart surgery performed to create a new route for blood around blocked or severely narrowed coronary vessels. It is performed under general anesthesia and usually requires a hospital stay of 7-10 days and a recovery period of 6-12 weeks.
Angioplasty is a procedure in which a narrowed vessel is opened with a balloon using a thin catheter inserted through the groin or wrist, and a stent is usually placed. It requires no surgical incision, but it is still an interventional procedure and requires a short hospital stay.
EECP is not a surgical procedure. By inflating and deflating cuffs wrapped around the legs in sync with the heart rhythm, blood flow to the heart is increased without surgery. It is an option considered especially for patients whose symptoms continue after bypass or stent, who are at high surgical risk, or who are not suitable for surgical treatment.
| Feature | EECP | Bypass Surgery | Angioplasty / Stent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgical Intervention | None | Open-heart surgery | Catheter procedure |
| Anesthesia | Not required | General anesthesia | Local anesthesia |
| Recovery Time | None | 6-12 weeks | A few days |
| Repeatability | Can be repeated when needed | Limited | Limited |
These three methods do not directly replace one another; each is considered in different clinical situations. For some patients a bypass or stent may be unavoidable, while for others EECP may stand out as a complementary or alternative option. A comprehensive cardiology evaluation is essential to make the right decision. This article is a summary that quickly compares the three methods side by side; for a more detailed comparison of EECP and bypass surgery, you can read our article Differences Between EECP and Bypass Surgery, and for a general overview of all treatment options, Comparing EECP With Other Heart Treatments.
Important note: This article is for general information only and is not a substitute for medical advice. The treatment method that is most suitable for you should be decided as a result of an evaluation with your cardiology specialist.
Contact us now for a free preliminary assessment, or complete our short test.